[{"Value":"","Discard":false,"Expires":9999999999}]
The post From disruption to recovery – UNICEF first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>
In early 2022 the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and the World Bank conducted a survey on the global effects of the Pandemic on education, and summarised their major findings entitled “Where are we on Education Recovery?“.
Their key findings were as follows:
UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that without urgent action to recover learning that was lost before and during COVID-19, the world faces a generational catastrophe.
UNICEF, UNESCO, and the World Bank have proposed a comprehensive strategy for education recovery (RAPID):
Reach and Retain: tracking the number of children that are back in school, and retain them in school
Assess: measuring students’ current learning levels
Prioritize: prioritsing teaching the fundamentals
Increase: increase catch-up learning by implementing programmes at scale to address learning losses
Develop: providing additional measures so that every child is ready to learn
The post From disruption to recovery – UNICEF first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>The post Re-imagining the future of learning – Peer to peer learning first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>
Peer tutoring and peer-learning encompass a range of approaches in which learners work together in small teams to provide each other with learning support. Essentially, peer tutoring relies upon learners helping others learners to learn. Some see this as a teaching strategy, but we believe that it is a far broader strategy.
There are different models for peer-tutoring, in which learners are placed together based upon age, or ability levels. Some examples include:
The common characteristic is that learners take on responsibility for aspects of learning and for evaluating their success.
There are many studies that show that peer tutoring approaches have a positive impact on learning, with participants averaging an improvement equivalent to approximately five additional months’ progress within an academic year.
Of particular importance is that peer-learning approaches are extremely cost effective to implement, and provide relief to scarce teacher resources.
“Peer-learning approaches are extremely cost effective to implement, and provide relief to scarce teacher resources”
There is also evidence to suggest that peer-tutoring is particularly effective with lower performing students, and those with foundational learning gaps.
In cross-age peer tutoring, some studies have found that a gap of fewer than three years is optimal, although ensuring that the gap is wide enough so that the work is challenging to the tutee whilst easy enough for the tutor to support them is key.
Peer tutoring appears to be particularly effective when learners and tutors are provided with quality support to ensure that the quality of learning is of a high level. There is also evidence to suggest that peer-tutoring is most effective as a reinforcement of pre-taught concepts, rather than as a means to introduce new learning concepts.
Peer-led tutoring approaches also help learners to close gaps in their learning by offering targeted, peer-led support to consolidate within class learning, practice skills, and identify and overcome misconceptions.
We embrace the peer-learning and peer-tutoring in our approach to youth learning and development. With more than two decades of experimentation and observation, we can confirm that there is very strong evidence as to the effectiveness of peer-learning approaches. Whilst our approach relies upon a number of learning models, peer learning is an important pillar.
We incorporate these principles into our programmes in the following ways:
There are a number of other elements to our approach that we will write about, and update this article as we proceed. Further posts will cover collaborative learning, self-directed learning, learner engagement, and lifelong learning skills
The post Re-imagining the future of learning – Peer to peer learning first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>The post COVID: The effects of unfinished learning – McKinsey & Co first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>
McKinsey and Co have published a paper on the effects of COVID-19 on the effects of the pandemic on student learning and well-being. The paper is entitled “COVID-19 and education: The lingering effects of unfinished learning”. The paper focuses primarily on the effects of the pandemic in the US, but the recommendations have global significance.
Listen to the article: COVID-19 and education: The lingering effects of unfinished learning
The paper highlights that the fallout from the pandemic threatens to depress this generation’s prospects and constrict their opportunities far into adulthood. They specifically highlight the term “unfinished learning” to refer to the fact that students were not given the opportunity this year to complete all the learning they would have completed in a typical year.
The report analyses the effects of ‘unfinished learning’, and some of the findings are as follows:
For the full analysis refer to the report.
By our interpretation, the key finding of the report is that the pandemic and ‘unfinished learning’ will have long-term effects on lifetime earnings, economic productivity, social integration, and personal health.
These are not new insights, but the value of the paper lies in the recommendations that McKinsey makes as to how to remedy the problem. Whilst we do not agree that all of these recommendations are relevant to the global problem, they offer some significant insights into the past state of education and also point to future developments in education.
Specifically, they refer to the recommendations made by the ‘Coalition to Advance Future Student Success‘, a think tank of leading educational practitioners.
These priorities encompass four potential actions for education:
These objectives are very similar to those recommended by UNESCO and the World Bank. See our post entitled: ‘From disruption to recovery – UNICEF’.
Of the above recommendations, what is of particular interest to us, because it complements our approach, is that McKinsey points out that opportunity gaps have existed in school systems for a long time. We think that this is a worldwide phenomenon. In their analysis, they provide recommendations to enhance education and learning in the future.
They highlight:
Whilst they don’t specifically endorse our view of the importance of community-based learning, they reflect that parents are considering hybrid models, remote learning, homeschooling, or learning hubs over the long term.
They conclude as we do that the future of ‘unfinished learning’ provides the global learning community a generational opportunity to re-imagine learning and that the pandemic will no doubt have profound effects on future learning endevours.
McKinsey is the oldest and largest of the “Big Three” management consultancies, the world’s three largest strategy consulting firms by revenue. It has consistently been recognized as the most prestigious consulting firm in the world.
Any commentary is solely the opinion of Winning Teams, and is not endorsed by McKinsey & Co.
The post COVID: The effects of unfinished learning – McKinsey & Co first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>
Infographic: Which children were left behind?
The post Which children were left behind – COVID 19 first appeared on Winning Teams.
]]>